An advantage of filing amendments under Article 19, or with a Demand for International Preliminary Examination, is that the amendments are made ‘centrally’ before the PCT authority, but can apply to all future national and regional phase applications. This can reduce costs in comparison to filing amendments separately in each individual country or region later in the process.
If a Demand for International Preliminary Examination is filed with amendments and/or arguments that address objections raised in the WOISA, a more positive International Report on Patentability (IPRP) may issue. This may lead to quicker, successful examination in individual countries or regions in which the PCT application is subsequently filed. There may also be commercial benefits in having a more positive IPRP, including to satisfy investors or other potential stakeholders in the IP rights.
However, there is no guarantee that a more positive International Report on Patentability (IPRP) will issue. Further, even if a more positive IPRP does issue, individual countries or regions in which the PCT application is subsequently filed may not agree with the report and/or may carry out further examination independently. Accordingly, many applicants choose to wait for examination to start in individual countries or regions in which the PCT application is subsequently filed, before filing amendments or arguments that are tailored to the examination position in each country or region.